Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hawley v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00659
Petitioner:
Garry Hawley
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owen v. Schmidit et al
as 7:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Francis Owen
Defendant:
Schmidt, Williams, Sgt. F. Garris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weatherford v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 7:2021cv00285
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Garry Weatherford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferebee v. Tate et al
as 7:2019cv00632
Plaintiff:
Lorenza Gerald Ferebee, Jr.
Defendant:
Delmar L. Tate, Amee B. Duncan and Garry A. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes v. Clarke et al
as 2:2019cv00035
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Terrance Huff, Earl Barksdale and others
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. New River Valley Community Services Pact Program et al
as 7:2019cv00171
Plaintiff:
Garry V. Long
Defendant:
HUD Housing US Govt Sec 8 and New River Valley Community Services Pact Program
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brown v. Jones
as 7:2019cv00081
Plaintiff:
Milton Antoine Brown and Sultan Imanuel El-Bey
Defendant:
Garry Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Infrastructure Corporation of America v. Burgess Trucking Company, Inc. et al
as 7:2009cv00006
Plaintiff:
Infrastructure Corporation of America and Infrastructure Corporation of America
Defendant:
Burgess Trucking Company, Inc. and Garry Robert Wood
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Castillo v. Benjamin et al
as 7:2007cv00470
Plaintiff:
Blas Rodregez Castillo
Defendant:
Michael T. Benjamin and Franklin Garris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castillo v. Garris et al
as 7:2007cv00464
Plaintiff:
Blas Rodregez Castillo
Defendant:
Franklin Garris and B.T. Michael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
