Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Rodger L. Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Grover Gaming, Inc. v. Huffman
as 7:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Grover Gaming, Inc.
Defendant:
Rodger Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Alexander v. Clarkson et al
as 7:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
John Hunter Alexander
Defendant:
Deputy Zach Clarkson, Sheriff E.W. Viars and Dean C. Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Trent et al
as 7:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
John Hunter Alexander
Defendant:
Timothy Trent, Chad Lipscomb, Kimberly Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Kazlauskas et al
as 6:2020cv00074
Plaintiff:
Alvin A. Stewart
Defendant:
Kimberly Rodgers, Mediko Correctional Health Care, Inc., Cynthia Arrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Felts v. Rodgers
as 3:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
John W. Felts, Jr.
Defendant:
Bradley M. Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Rodgers v. Edmonds et al
as 7:2012cv00216
Defendant:
Bernard Booker, Larry T. Edmonds, Karen McNeely and others
Plaintiff:
Derona Rodgers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Ley et al
as 7:2012cv00051
Defendant:
U S Attorney General, Lewis T Babcock, Richard H Battey and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rodgers v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv00036
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Rodgers
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Turner v. Rodgers, III
as 7:2009cv00372
Plaintiff:
Leonard E. Turner
Defendant:
J. Patterson Rodgers, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
