Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Dixon v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Hunter Dixon
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, J. Artrip, Major Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Anderson
as 7:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Marcus Le'Shawn Dixon
Defendant:
Rick White and Dave Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonita v. U.S.P-Lee employees et al
as 7:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Eric Bonita
Defendant:
U.S.P-Lee employees, C/O Hamilton, Correctional Officer Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
United States of America v. Approximately $71,980.00 in U.S. currency
as 5:2023cv70454
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $71,980.00 in U.S. currency
Claimant:
Rueben Dixon
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Dixon v. USA
as 1:2023cv81532
Petitioner:
Jessica Dixon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dixon v. USA
as 1:2022cv81504
Petitioner:
Jessica Dixon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dixon v. Director, Department of Corrections
as 7:2020cv00684
Petitioner:
Marcus Le'Shawn Dixon
Respondent:
Director, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Davis et al
as 7:2020cv00625
Defendant:
Major C.D. Davis, C/O Honiker and C/O Dixon
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conte et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Becky Crannis-Curl, Edward Gorcenski, Brian Joseph Moran and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Balogh and Gregory Conte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Green v. Ratliff et al
as 7:2020cv00310
Defendant:
C/O Dixon, Unit Manager Collins, C/O J. Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
