Cases 91 - 100 of 15,592
George v. The Colville Confederated Tribes et al
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Andrea D George
Defendant:
rodney cawston, jack ferguson, Richard Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302 Indian Civil Rights
Bauer v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Dallas Bauer
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Key Tronic Corporation v. ADDCO LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Key Tronic Corporation
Defendant:
ADDCO LLC and ADDCO Acquisition LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gessel v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05038
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gessel
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Key Tronic Corporation v. Fio Corporation
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Key Tronic Corporation
Defendant:
Fio Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
First Interstate Bank v. Wall Street Apartments, LLC
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
First Interstate Bank
Defendant:
Wall Street Apartments, LLC
Interested Party:
Alaa Elkharwily
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Carlson et al v. Adams County et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Chauna Carlson and Andrew Carlson
Defendant:
Adams County, Adams County Sheriffs Office, Adams County Sheriff Dale Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Huezo v. Haynes
as 4:2024cv05037
Petitioner:
Juan Luna Huezo
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
