Cases 11 - 20 of 130
Jones v Franklin County et al
as 4:2022cv05138
Estate Plaintiff:
Estate of Dante Jones
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY, et. al,, Cody Quantrell, Jim Raymond and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
National Center for Public Policy Research v. Schultz et al
as 2:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
National Center for Public Policy Research
Defendant:
Howard Schultz, Starbucks Corporation, Kevin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
Adam Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fletcher v. Jones
as 2:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
Olajide Adel Fletcher
Respondent:
Tom Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Karla Marie Jones
Defendant:
John Earl Jones, Mr. Clay, Joseph Evan Lafrance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Denzel Lamont Kent Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03046
Plaintiff:
Jack W Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Zachary Wayne Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
