Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Brooks v. Gallagher et al
as 4:2024cv05028
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
K Gallagher, Lisa Robtoy, Lori Ramsdellgilkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crook v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03181
Plaintiff:
Tammy Crook
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sprinkle v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Tammy Sprinkle
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Young v. Vintage Stock Inc
as 2:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Tammy Young
Defendant:
Vintage Stock Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Piazza v. Piazza et al
as 2:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tammy Gail Piazza
Defendant:
Jeffrey Donald Piazza, Josephine Kinerson, Threasa Ann Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Ejectment
Froman v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03042
Plaintiff:
Tammy Lynn Froman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hawkins v. Neau et al
as 4:2022cv05120
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brooks Hawkins
Defendant:
Jonathan Neau, Timothy J Taylor, Kenneth G Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Havlik v. Roberts et al
as 2:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Milan Richard Havlik, Jr
Defendant:
Bill Roberts, Tammi Denney and Randal Cline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartlett v. Hazel et al
as 2:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Douglas Alan Bartlett
Defendant:
Judge Tony Hazel, Commissioner Tammy Chavez, Attorney Gary Stenzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
