Cases 21 - 30 of 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Adjustment of Status of Nonimmigrant to Permanent Resident
Andres v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05897
Plaintiff:
Bismar Francisco Andres
Defendant:
Pierce County, Severson, C/O Desmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Miller v. Thurston County et al
as 3:2023cv05745
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ross Miller
Defendant:
Thurston County, Nicolas Andersen and Joel Nault
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Curtis et al v. Inslee et al
as 3:2023cv05741
Plaintiff:
Aila Curtis, Ciera Agee, Alison Archer and others
Defendant:
Jay Robert Inslee, PeaceHealth, Liz Dunne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estes v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05749
Plaintiff:
Jacy Joe Estes
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeAir v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05738
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Grey LeAir
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rozier v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05724
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eugene Rozier
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Sieverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
