Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Defferding v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Anne Marie Defferding
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Washington State Department of Revenue et al
as 2:2023cv01300
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Revenue, Newmark, Martin Selig and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gordon v. Extra Storage Space
as 3:2023cv05619
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Gordon
Defendant:
Extra Storage Space
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Benton et al v. City of Seattle
as 2:2020cv01174
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Garrison, Shelby Bryant, Clare Thomas and others
Defendant:
City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv05102
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Teleena Ann Marie Nicol Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2018cv01056
Plaintiff:
Anne Block and Anne K Block
Defendant:
Judge Michael R Scott, Anne Marie Soto, King County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Block v. King County Superior Court et al
as 3:2018cv05579
Plaintiff:
Anne Block and Anne K Block
Defendant:
Anne Marie Soto, Laura Inveen, King County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Block v. Washington State Bar Association et al
as 2:2018cv00907
Plaintiff:
Anne K Block
Defendant:
Washington State Bar Association , Kevin Bank, Linda Eide and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goss v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01888
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ann-Marie Goss
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
