Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Chennette et al v. Porch.com et al
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Nathan Chennette, Larry Akins, Gary Alger and others
Defendant:
Porch.com, GoSmith Inc, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Russell v. Bellingham Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv01863
Plaintiff:
Vincent Russell
Defendant:
Bellingham Police Department, C Johnson, B Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Stroup et al
as 3:2021cv05632
Plaintiff:
Drew Thompson
Defendant:
Stroup, Cheryl Strange, Katyanna Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saleem v. Washington State
as 3:2019cv05802
Petitioner:
Burt Franklin Saleem
Respondent:
Washington State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Citizens Insurance Company of America v. Fraley et al
as 3:2019cv05401
Plaintiff:
Citizens Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Burt Fraley, BFD Development, LLC and Kathy Fraley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. Washington State Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 3:2018cv06026
Defendant:
Glenda Cummings and Washington State Department of Social and Health Services
Plaintiff:
Burt Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teters v. Washington State et al
as 3:2018cv05481
Plaintiff:
Paul Teters
Defendant:
Washington State, Nathaniel Burt, Tilahun Abraha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Shaw
as 3:2018cv05101
Plaintiff:
Burt Daniels
Defendant:
Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burts v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv05010
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Burts
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Goninan v. Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv05714
Plaintiff:
Nathan Robert Goninan
Defendant:
Washington Department of Corrections, Eleanor Vernell, Karie Rainer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
