Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Rogers v. Norman et al
as 2:2024cv01465
Defendant:
Andrea Williams, King County, Troy Bacon and others
Plaintiff:
Ray Clarence Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saeedy et al v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Noah Saeedy, Vishal Shah, Tina Wilkinson and others
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Rogers v. King County et al
as 2:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
Ray Clarence Rogers
Defendant:
King County, Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, Allen Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Tacoma Police et al
as 3:2020cv05548
Defendant:
Tacoma Housing Development, Brame, Tacoma Police and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda M Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. County of Pierce et al
as 3:2020cv05207
Defendant:
Jessica A Williams, County of Pierce, Janel French and others
Plaintiff:
Broderick J Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv05137
Plaintiff:
Heidi Moses
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Juarez et al v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2018cv06012
Defendant:
Western State Hospital, Greater Lakes Mental Health Care of Pierce County, State of Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Robbie Juarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv05055
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Moses
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chen et al
as 2:2017cv00405
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Andy Shin Fong Chen , Aero Space Port International Group, Inc , North American Foreign Trade Zone Industries, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
