Cases 21 - 30 of 550
Ward v. Noble
as 2:2024cv00353
Petitioner:
Lathan Steven Ward
Respondent:
Jon Noble and Capt Jon Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. City of Milwaukee Wisconsin et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Santos Sanchez
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee Wisconsin, Moises Gomez, George Irizarry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCoy v. Heiser Automotive Group et al
as 2:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Steven McCoy
Defendant:
Joe Fikejs, Heiser Automotive Group, Chris Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Semons v. Stevens
as 2:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
Floyd L Semons
Respondent:
Chris Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kyle James King
Defendant:
Steven Johnson, Sgt Furgason, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00180
Petitioner:
Tyrone Davis Smith
Respondent:
Steven Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lewis v. Milwaukee County Circuit Court et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Marcus L Lewis
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Circuit Court, Milwaukee County Sheriff's Office, Wisconsin State Public Defender, Milwaukee Trial Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Jewell
as 2:2024cv00141
Petitioner:
Steven Lamar Harris
Respondent:
Chantell Jewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vega v. Stevens
as 2:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Alfredo Vega
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Stevens
as 2:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Steven Dionne Scott
Respondent:
Chris Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
