Cases 31 - 40 of 257
Banks v. Luther et al
as 2:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Darius D Banks, Sr
Defendant:
Eric Luther, Mental health staff and Melissa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Borowski et al
as 2:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Ambrose McDaniel, Sr
Defendant:
David L Borowski and State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Milwaukee County Jail
as 2:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Ambrose McDaniel, Sr
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loga Negru v. Early
as 2:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Cristian M Loga Negru
Defendant:
Louis S Early, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farris v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Phillip Farris, Sr
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Overtime Sports Bar and Lounge LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01419
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Overtime Sports Bar and Lounge LLC doing business as Overtime Sports Bar and Lounge, Wesley E Harrell, Sr and Mary M Harrell
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Reese v. Krones Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01382
Plaintiff:
Michael F Reese, Sr
Defendant:
Krones Inc, Mark Doolittle, John Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01319
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pickett v. Santander Consumer USA
as 2:2021cv01272
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dorran Pickett, Sr
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gill v. Kedzierski et al
as 2:2021cv01154
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant:
Anna Kedzierski, Kevin Mauthe, Veronica Solecki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
