Cases 1 - 10 of 382
Puchner v. Maxwell et al
as 2:2024cv00478
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Mike Maxwell, Lisa Neubauer, Eric Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Walker v. Briggs et al
as 2:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Eric Darcell Walker, Jr
Defendant:
Director Briggs, Warden Jason Benzel, CO B Kapolnek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Wood and Eric S Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harmon v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Joshua W Harmon
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, C O'Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olson v. Severson
as 2:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Ian Alan Olson
Defendant:
Eric J Severson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brady Corporation et al v. Wood et al
as 2:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Brady Corporation and Brady Worldwide Inc
Defendant:
Eric Wood and Tailored Label Products Inc
Washington v. Cepress et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Tiron Washington
Defendant:
Timothy Cepress, Eric Kukowski, Lorn Anschutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stahmann v. Muellenbach
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Rhoda Stahmann
Defendant:
Eric Muellenbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eggum v. Severson
as 2:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Keith Eggum
Respondent:
Eric J Severson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davenport v. Robertson et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Lt Lukas Robertson, Kevin Pitzen, Eric Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
