Cases 11 - 20 of 568
Cofield et al v. Antero Resources Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Cofield and Karen A. Cofield
Defendant:
Antero Resources Corporation, David I. Beem, Tyrone L. Beem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jacques v. City of Bridgeport et al
as 1:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Jacques
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, Louis David Janssen and William L. Townsend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hunt v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00192
Petitioner:
David Hunt
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hunt v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00189
Petitioner:
David D. Hunt
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Aaron I. Scott
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Baskin v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
David Lamont Baskin
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tasker et al v. Black Rock Wind Force, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Danny R. Tasker, Betty J. Tasker and David W. Tasker
Defendant:
Black Rock Wind Force, LLC and Clearway Energy Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Luster v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00029
Petitioner:
David Antoine Luster
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Allen v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
David M. Allen
Defendant:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Allen v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
David M. Allen
Defendant:
Acting Warden S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
