Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Floyd v. Love
as 2:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
Johnny D. Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
Matthew Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frisenda v. Floyd et al
as 1:2017cv00089
Plaintiff:
Dawn Frisenda
Defendant:
Lindsey Floyd and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bates v. Saad et al
as 5:2016cv00161
Plaintiff:
Donald Choya Bates
Defendant:
Jennifer Saad, R. Mulac, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bates v. Saad et al
as 1:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
Donald Choya Bates
Defendant:
Jennifer Saad, R. Mulac, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roby v. USA
as 2:2016cv00074
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Floyd Edward Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Floyd v. Seneca Trustees Inc.
as 3:2015cv00068
Plaintiff:
Eric Patrick Floyd
Defendant:
Seneca Trustees Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Floyd v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Floyd
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barber et al v. Magnum Land Services, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
Floyd Barber , Shawn Barber , Richard Beeghly and others
Defendant:
Magnum Land Services, LLC , Belmont Resources, LLC , Enerplus Resources (USA) Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Barber et al v. Magnum Land Services, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00079
Plaintiff:
Floyd Barber , Shawn Barber , Richard Beeghly and others
Defendant:
Magnum Land Services, LLC , Belmont Resources, LLC , Enerplus Resources (USA) Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Barber et al v. Magnum Land Services, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00047
Plaintiff:
Floyd Barber , Shawn Barber , Richard Beeghly and others
Defendant:
Magnum Land Services, LLC , Belmont Resources, LLC , Enerplus Resources (USA) Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
