Cases 31 - 40 of 213
Monroe v. USA
as 1:2022cv00057
Petitioner:
David Christopher Monroe
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mountain States Pressure Service, Inc. v. ROC Service Company, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Mountain States Pressure Service, Inc.
Defendant:
ROC Service Company, LLC and Christopher Holup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC, v. Christopher
as 5:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
Robert H. Christopher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hoover v. Corbin et al
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Hoover
Defendant:
Patricia D. Corbin, Christopher Meyer, Ellen Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Leon v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 3:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Brendon A. Leon
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Director Christopher Wray, US Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Kilmer et al
as 3:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Hamilton
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff Department, G.W. Kilmer, Ramey's Towing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wojdag v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Wojdag
Defendant:
Schneider National Carriers, Inc. and Nelson B. Garcia, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kokinda v. Foster et al
as 3:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jason Steven Kokinda
Defendant:
Cprl. T.H. Foster, Ptlm. K.A. Shiflett, Cprl. S.P. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tye v. Bowers
as 5:2021cv00138
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Tye
Respondent:
F.J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Whitfield v. F.J. Bowers
as 5:2021cv00108
Petitioner:
Christopher Whitfield
Respondent:
F.J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
