Cases 41 - 50 of 489
Arnold v. Syngenta Crop Protection AG
as 5:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Leslie C. Arnold
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clinton v. Groh et al
as 5:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant:
Gina M. Groh, Robert W. Trumble, Anna Krasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Chief of Police Wheeling Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Julian Lee Green
Defendant:
Chief of Police Wheeling Police Department, Officer B. Hoehn and Officer C. Castilow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Metro Towers, LLC v. Duff et al
as 1:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Metro Towers, LLC
Defendant:
Michael C. Duff and Barbara C. Ludlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Good et al v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 1:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Good and Lori Kay Good/Rademacher
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Davis v. Jardine et al
as 3:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Laura C. Davis
Defendant:
Jeffrey Jardine, Sandra Jardine, Home Hero, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sonda et al v. Justice, II
as 5:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Scott Sonda and Brian Corwin
Defendant:
James C. Justice, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Weems v. SFF Hazelton, Warden
as 5:2022cv00106
Petitioner:
Lisa C. Weems
Respondent:
SFF Hazelton, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirkwood v. Bayless
as 3:2022cv00064
Petitioner:
David C. Kirkwood
Respondent:
Warden M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
