Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Cole v. Bolar
as 5:2024cv00189
Defendant:
J. Bolar
Plaintiff:
James Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fruner v. Croghan
as 5:2024cv00173
Defendant:
Cole Croghan
Plaintiff:
Dylan Fruner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. West Virginia Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv00072
Defendant:
Lisa Drake, Danielle Fenstemacher, Frida Deberry and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Lynn Cole, Britany Lynn Walker and Kimber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney and Angel Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney, Angel Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, William Marshall, III, Jeff Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole, Jr v. Ray et al
as 5:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
James T. Cole, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Ray, Mr. Barnes and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cofield et al v. Antero Resources Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Cofield and Karen A. Cofield
Defendant:
Antero Resources Corporation, David I. Beem, Tyrone L. Beem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cole v. Rokosky et al
as 5:2023cv00023
Petitioner:
Janhoi Benjamin Cole
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Greene v. Justice et al
as 5:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Defendant:
Randolph County, Jim Justice, Betsy C. Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
