Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Marsh v. Garrett et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Marsh
Defendant:
J. R. Garrett, A. Jordan, L. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heard et al v. West Virginia United Health System, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Dominique Heard, Amanda Luzader and Kenneth Miklich
Defendant:
West Virginia United Health System, Inc., West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc., Community Health Association doing business as Jackson General Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Garrett v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00061
Petitioner:
Jihad Garrett
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garrett v. Wolfe
as 5:2022cv00202
Petitioner:
Jihad Garrett
Respondent:
R.M. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grubb v. Hensley et al
as 1:2021cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jordan Grubb
Defendant:
Jeremy R. Garrett and Jason O. Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teets et al v. Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00195
Defendant:
Garrett Mine Supply, Inc., United Central Industrial Supply Company, L.L.C., Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John N. Teets and Debra Teets
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garrett et al v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv00185
Plaintiff:
Roger Reid, Michael Garrett, Abewole Ojo and others
Defendant:
John Doe, 15, John Doe, 10, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Garrett v. Okley
as 3:2018cv00206
Defendant:
Mr. Okley
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garrett v. Okley
as 3:2018cv00194
Defendant:
Mr. Okley
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
