Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lawson v. City of St Albans, WV et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Reginald Craig Lawson
Defendant:
City of St Albans, WV, Kanawah County, WV and State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Little v. Ray et al
as 5:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
Jerlaine Little
Respondent:
Warden Ray, Case Manager Lawson and Unit Manager Dzuback
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gilmore v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00308
Petitioner:
Cynthia Gilmore
Respondent:
Warden, Warden Lovette, H.L. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Payne v. Rohrbaugh et al
as 1:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge John D. Rohrbaugh, Asst. Prosecutor Attorney, CPT Kesner and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher N. Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Sheeley et al
as 5:2020cv00040
Respondent:
John Sheeley and Lawson
Petitioner:
Christopher Nelson Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lawson et al v. GPS Hospitality, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Lawson, Jr. and Barbara A. Lawson
Defendant:
GPS Hospitality, LLC and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Canopius US Insurance, Inc. v. BMP, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Canopius US Insurance, Inc.
Defendant:
BMP, LLC, Mottie Pavone, Onewallstreet, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knight v. Lawson et al
as 5:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Knight, II
Defendant:
Edgar Lawson, Davidson, Erica Kesner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00115
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bratcher v. Tina Tilllman, et al
as 5:2010cv00090
Plaintiff:
Kevin Maurice Bratcher
Defendant:
Tina Tillman and Edgar L. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
