Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Mullins v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Ralph J. Mullins
Defendant:
Cranston D. Johnson, Steve Andryzcik, Edie Viola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Copen SR v. Daniels et al
as 5:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Copen SR
Defendant:
Pam Daniels, Erin Lynn, Misty Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClung et al v. Brooks Run Mining Company, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Robert McClung, Rocky Moore, James Ray and others
Defendant:
Brooks Run Mining Company, LLC and William Abraham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Murray et al v. Steve Kemper Builder, LLC
as 3:2021cv00068
Plaintiff:
Lori Murray and John Murray
Defendant:
Steve Kemper Builder, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Armstrong Hardwood Flooring Company et al
as 2:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Armstrong Hardwood Flooring Company, Blair Louk and Steve Swecker
Plaintiff:
David Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Duncan v. Jividen et al
as 1:2019cv00100
Respondent:
Joe Shiflett, Keefe, Amanda Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Timberlake Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2018cv00193
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Michael Martin, Ms. Sherry Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2018cv00165
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jeff S. Sandy, Adminstrator Michael K. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reed and Matthew D. Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singo v. USA
as 5:2018cv00034
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Steve G. Singo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
