Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Forloine v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
Mara Forloine
Defendant:
Jeffrey H. Coben, Cynthia Beane, Aetna Better Health of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rauch v. Wayne County DHHR/CPS et al
as 3:2020cv00664
Plaintiff:
Jordan L. Rauch
Defendant:
Retired Judge Darrell L. Pratt, Judge James H. Young, Jr., Tomas M. Plymale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Armstead et al
as 2:2020cv00641
Petitioner:
Barbara Terrell and Barbara Renner
Respondent:
Evan H. Jenkins, Elizabeth D. Walker, Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nutter et al v. Mellinger et al
as 2:2019cv00787
Defendant:
Ross H. Mellinger, S. C. Fisher, L. M. Casto and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Nutter and Carrie Barnette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
P. A. et al v. Fayette County Board of Education et al
as 2:2019cv00705
Defendant:
Fayette County Board of Education and Donna Evans
Plaintiff:
P. A. and H. K.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Mellinger et al
as 2:2019cv00493
Defendant:
Ross H. Mellinger, Jackson County Commission and Tony Boggs
Plaintiff:
Cody Ryan Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Lovejoy et al
as 3:2018cv01523
Defendant:
Putnam County Commission, B. W. Pauley, B. E. Donahoe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Justice et al
as 2:2018cv01316
Defendant:
Jill Upson, Tom Takubo, Charles H. Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Jean Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
