Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bygum et al v. The City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2019cv00456
Plaintiff:
Deborah Bygum and Eric Michell Young
Defendant:
The City of Montgomery, Roger L. King and The Montgomery Policy Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Eplin et al
as 3:2015cv00713
Plaintiff:
Sandra Michelle Johnson
Defendant:
Elizabeth Diamond Eplin and West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources for Children and Families
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vines-Carter v. Voter Registration of Columbus Ohio
as 2:2015cv02902
Defendant:
Voter Registration of Columbus Ohio
Plaintiff:
Anna Michelle Vines-Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1211
Kelly v. Mines et al
as 5:2013cv09351
Plaintiff:
Michelle E. Kelly
Defendant:
Richard Mines and Greenbrier County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bailey vs Cabell County Commission
as 3:2011cv00407
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bailey
Defendant:
Cabell County Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kerns v. West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2009cv01072
Plaintiff:
Michelle Kerns
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility, Correctional Officer Donahoe, Correctional Officer Donahoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
