Cases 21 - 30 of 126,544
Nofflett v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Joseph Nofflett
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Goods v. Daley et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
James A. Daley, Deputy Turner, Deputy Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
City of Ravenswood v. American Zurich Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
The City of Ravenswood
Defendant:
American Zurich Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Ramirez-Torres v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Patricio Ramirez-Torres
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ball v. Antoun
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
David Ball
Defendant:
Basim Antoun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Breedlove-Crabtree v. Capital One, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Pepper Breedlove-Crabtree
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Boggs v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Dustin Boggs and Luke Tyler Holstein
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Tiffany Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Chafin v. Caudill et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chafin
Defendant:
Steve Caudill, Superintendent Jason Hutson, Joseph Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Greg Martin
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Sandra May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
