Cases 31 - 40 of 2,527
Steelman v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00599
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Steelman
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lee v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Osborne v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00531
Petitioner:
Robert Louis Gray Osborne
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Winebrenner v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
as 2:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Winebrenner
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Roberts v. Holzapel
as 5:2023cv00496
Petitioner:
Phillip Roberts
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard and W. Holzapel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Key et al v. Appalachian Power Company et al
as 5:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Candace M. Key and Robert Shawn Key
Defendant:
Appalachian Power Company, American Electric Power Company, Inc. and Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sharp v. United States
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Robert Carl Sharp
Defendant:
Lt. C. Looney, Officer Specialist B. Jones, Correctional Officer Hatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Gorman v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00468
Petitioner:
Robert Logan Gorman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Whipple v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00416
Petitioner:
Robert Z. Whipple, III
Respondent:
Warden Katrina Heckard and W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
