Cases 71 - 80 of 126,536
Brown et al v. Walmart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
William Brown and Sharon Jean Brown
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Grand Central Parkersburg LLC v. Shoe Show, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Grand Central Parkersburg LLC
Defendant:
Shoe Show, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hancock v. Occeus et al
as 2:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Abigail Hancock
Defendant:
Walky Occeus and Tesla Cargo Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stainback v. Occeus et al
as 2:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Savannah Stainback
Defendant:
Walky Occeus and Tesla Cargo Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Hamrick et al
as 5:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Davis
Defendant:
Howard S. Hamrick and Walnut Ridge Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Krafnick et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Angela Krafnick and Theodore Krafnick
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Lapsley v. City of Huntington, West Virginia et al
as 3:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L. Lapsley
Defendant:
City of Huntington, West Virginia and Kathy Burks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lindsey v. Cutright
as 1:2024cv00205
Petitioner:
Shaun Lindsey
Respondent:
C. Cutright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Downey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Connie Ladonna Downey
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
