Cases 1 - 10 of 286
Baker v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Beverly Allen Baker
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harper v. Baker et al
as 2:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kenny Harper
Defendant:
Sgt. Baker, Corporal Riddle and West Virginia Division of Correction and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1991
Jeffers v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Matthew Jeffers
Defendant:
Administrator Carl Aldridge, C.O. Lloyd Irwin, C.O. Pringle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dagostine et al v. Pendleton et al
as 2:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dagostine and Ramona Dagostine
Defendant:
Mark Pendleton, Baker Tilly US, LLP, Arnett Carbis Toothman LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Holland et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00377
Plaintiff:
Ralph Baker and June Holland
Defendant:
John David Workman, CSX Transportation, Inc., Michael Belter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker-Moore v. Ames et al
as 2:2020cv00267
Plaintiff:
LeMir Baker-Moore
Defendant:
Col. Frame, Cpt. Toney, Betsy Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Sereal et al
as 3:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
Shannon Baker
Defendant:
Major Aldridge, Superintendant Sereal and Western Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chinn v. Sereal et al
as 3:2019cv00853
Defendant:
Major Aldridge, Western Regional Jail and Superintendant Sereal
Plaintiff:
Mike Smith, Donald Porter, Jeffrey Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Muraka
as 1:2019cv00726
Petitioner:
Vincente Antoine Baker
Respondent:
C. Muraka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
