Cases 1 - 10 of 779
Truist Bank v. Gregory T. Harvey, D.D.S., Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank
Defendant:
Gregory T. Harvey, D.D.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Honaker v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Gerald Leon Honaker
Defendant:
Sgt. W. E. Rose, Dep. J. A. Brooks, Dep. M. S. Altice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wickline et al v. Cumberledge et al
as 2:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Jason Wickline and Shanna Wickline
Defendant:
Cpl. T. J. Cumberledge, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Skaggs v. Hoke et al
as 2:2023cv00759
Petitioner:
Shelby Dean Skaggs
Respondent:
Jay M. Hoke, Victor Navy, T. M. Divita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawford v. Daniels et al
as 2:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Kelly Crawford
Defendant:
Camryn T. Daniels, Boone County Sheriff's Office, Boone County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Canterbury v. Andritz Separation, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Eric T. Canterbury
Defendant:
Andritz Separation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Staples, Bey v. Childress et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Don Juan Staples, Bey
Defendant:
H. Childress, Matt Hill, Officer Daber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
