Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Goods v. Cox et al
as 1:2024cv00326
Defendant:
M. Shane Hall, James A. Daley, Eric Eckes and others
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Goods v. Daley et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Defendant:
Deputy Tyler, Sgt. Haskins, Deputy Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Young et al
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Dairion E. Morgan
Defendant:
FCI Beckley Warden Young, FCI Beckley Warden Heckard, Doctor Roger Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pasadyn v. Constellium Rolled Products et al
as 2:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
David Pasadyn
Defendant:
Constellium Rolled Products, Constellium, Constellium of West Virginia and others
McVay v. Goode
as 1:2019cv00521
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mid-Atlantic Regional Office and Dr. William Goode
Plaintiff:
Franklin Tuck McVay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hunt v. Carver, et al
as 1:2019cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J. Hunt
Defendant:
FCI McDowell, Mr. Johnson, P.A. William Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muto v. Pro Performance Sports, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01353
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Muto
Defendant:
Pro Performance Sports, LLC and Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blackstone v. Stark et al
as 1:2018cv00910
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Blackstone
Defendant:
Ashley Stark, Sherri Lilly, Smith, Ms. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Milam et al
as 5:2018cv00994
Plaintiff:
Jermain Santell Hill
Defendant:
T. Milam, E. Stennet, David Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Good et al
as 2:2018cv00781
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Loretta Good, Jessica Good and Loretta's Hangout, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
