Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Knotts v. Baily
as 2:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Zachary Knotts
Defendant:
Judge Jennifer Baily
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knotts v. Bailey
as 2:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
Zachary Knotts
Defendant:
Jennifer Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knotts v. Marra et al
as 2:2021cv00176
Defendant:
WV Forensic Mental Hygiene Examiners Jane and John Doe 1 to 10, WVU Medicine Litigating Council Members Jane and John Doe 1 to 10, Mark Spangler and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Knotts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliott-Knotts et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00945
Plaintiff:
Marva Elliott-Knotts and Lawrence E. Knotts
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Arch Coal, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11838
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of West Virginia , West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and others
Defendant:
Arch Coal, Inc., Hawthorne Coal Co., Inc., ICG Beckley, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Knott v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv29596
Plaintiff:
Christina M. Knott
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knotts v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv26006
Plaintiff:
Sherry Knotts
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knotts v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv25659
Plaintiff:
Alisha Dawn Knotts
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knott et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11207
Plaintiff:
Cecelia Ann Knott and Gary Knott
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knotts et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv04720
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Knotts and Kevin Knotts
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
