Cases 1 - 10 of 1,305
Clark v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Lisa Kristine Clark
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thompson v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Lisa D. Thompson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Neely v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00752
Petitioner:
Lisa F. Neely
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Czerner v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Ann Elizabeth Allen Czerner
Defendant:
Kristy A. Smith, Troy Allen Tucker, Joyce Sowards Boggess and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
King et al v. Clendenin et al
as 2:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Barbara King and Preston King
Defendant:
Stephanie Clendenin, Zachary Sybert, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gowings v. Clark et al
as 5:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Bruce Allen Gowings
Defendant:
Robyn Clark, Kayla Ransbottom, Pepper Arrowood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Solomon v. Air Academy Federal Credit Union
as 3:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Lisa Solomon
Defendant:
Air Academy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Folse v. Kanawha County Commission et al
as 2:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jay Folse
Defendant:
Kanawha County Commission, Vera McCormick, Lin Tech International, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Folse v. McCuskey, et al
as 2:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Jay Folse
Defendant:
John McCuskey, Jr., G. Russell Rollyson, Jr., Wallace Looney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gerideau-Williams v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00169
Petitioner:
Lisa Gerideau-Williams
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
