Cases 21 - 30 of 63
PURISIMA v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv14903
Plaintiff:
ANTON PURISIMA
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PURISIMA v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT et al
as 2:2018cv12034
Plaintiff:
ANTON PURISIMA
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, SECAUCUS TRAIN STATION, CITY OF SECAUCUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purisima v. New York City Transit Authority et al
as 1:2017cv07796
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
New York City Transit Authority, City of New York and Does 1 - 4000
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anton Purisima v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 17-3178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTON PURISIMA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL JOSEPH MORRISSEY, AMTRAK POLICE and others
Laconico v. Clear Reconveyance Corp.
as 5:2017cv04480
Plaintiff:
Purisima C. Laconico
Defendant:
Clear Reconveyance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PURISIMA v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2017cv05312
Plaintiff:
ANTON PURISIMA
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, GREYHOUND BUS LINES CORPORATION , GREYHOUND LINES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laconico v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation et al
as 5:2017cv00698
Plaintiff:
Purisima C. Laconico
Defendant:
Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and World Savings Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Purisima v. City of New York ("City") et al
as 1:2016cv09786
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
City of New York ("City"), Human Resources Administration (HRA), T. Edema and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Purisima v. New York City Transit Authorit
as 16-4179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anton Purisima
Defendant - Appellee:
New York City Transit Authority, and/or MABSTOA, City of New York, Metropolitan Transit Authority New York City Transit and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
