Cases 71 - 80 of 5,720
Collins et al v. Apple Inc.
as CAN/3:24-CV-01796
Plaintiff:
Collins, Deborah Collins, Hunter Collins and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Schermer v. Apple Inc.
as CAN/3:24-CV-01815
Plaintiff:
Schermer and Jared Schermer
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Hall v. Treasurer of the United States, et al.
as 24-3199
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
TREASURER OF THE UNITED STATES, APPLE INC., T-MOBILE US, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04055
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant:
APPLE, INC. and APPLE INC.
Petitioner:
PHV NICOLE DEMERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
TOT Power Control, S.L. v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
TOT Power Control, S.L.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Not Yet Classified:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0007 Petition to compel attendance before arbitrator
Godfrey v. Eunice City Court et al
as 6:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Johnny Godfrey, Jr
Defendant:
Eunice City Court, Ville Platte City Court, City of Ville Platte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kane v. Apple Inc.
as 4:2024cv02193
Plaintiff:
Lisa Johnston Kane
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Grubmarket Inc. v. James Corrado, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02652
Plaintiff:
Grubmarket Inc. doing business as Leo's Apples
Defendant:
James Corrado, Inc. doing business as Corrado's Market, Peter Corrado, Joseph Corrado and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. APPLE INC.
as NJ/2:24-CV-04055
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
