Cases 91 - 100 of 5,742
ACETO v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv05663
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ACETO
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
DAINES et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv05359
Plaintiff:
TORY DAINES and SARAH BABB
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Morrison v. University of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Susan D Morrison
Defendant:
University of Texas, State of Texas, Thomas Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Apple v. NLRB
as 24-60242
Petitioner:
Apple, Incorporated
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
CROCCO v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv05281
Plaintiff:
Matthew Crocco
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. APPLE CORING & CUTTING CORP.
as 2:2024cv05717
Petitioner:
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, P.C.
Respondent:
APPLE CORING & CUTTING CORP.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
KOLINSKY et al v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv04232
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA KOLINSKY and SIDNEY ROSSI
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Loewen v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv02006
Plaintiff:
Erik D. Loewen
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
