Cases 21 - 30 of 2,844
Ubhi v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv02995
Plaintiff:
Maghar Ubhi
Defendant:
Jaime Leverton, Shenif Visram, Bill Tai and others
Yoshimoto v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Warren Yoshimoto, Kristin Barroga, Sean Kettley and others
Defendant:
Alaska Airlines, Inc. and Alaska Air Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-2334
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant:
I. JACQUEZ, D. SUH, B. CRAY and others
Nickson v. Bill Page Motors Inc.
as 1:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Beaufort Nickson
Defendant:
Bill Page Motors Inc. doing business as Bill Page Toyota
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Whalen, et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 24-2086
Petitioner:
CHRISTINE WHALEN, KATHERINE ARCELL, JOSE BRITO and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Interested Party:
ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC., CERBERUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP and THE KROGER CO.
Thompson v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv02542
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Thompson
Defendant:
Jamie Leverton, Shenif Visram, Joseph Flinn and others
Crosby Capital USA LLC v. AmGuard Insurance Company
as 24-848
Plaintiff:
CROSBY CAPITAL USA LLC
Defendant:
AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, NAVILA ASSET MANAGEMENT INC, K.S. BILLING AND ASSOCIATES INC and others
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, f/k/a/ AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC. v. BELL, JR.
as 2:2024cv01357
Petitioner:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, f/k/a/ AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC.
Respondent:
BILL BELL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hearns v. Trahune, et al.
as 24-1796
Petitioner:
CLARENCE L. HEARNS
Respondent:
CAL TRAHUNE and BILL LOCKYER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
