Cases 21 - 30 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Charles Smith
as 19-50123
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES SMITH, AKA Big Solo, AKA DeShawn Henderson, AKA Charles Teramail Smith, AKA Charles Tremell Smith, AKA Kevin Smith, AKA Snoop Dog
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Charles Smith
as 19-1715
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Marshall Smith, also known as Blue
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Smith et al v. Saint Paul Travelers Company Inc.
as 1:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Smith v. JR Reynolds Tobacco Company et al
as 2:2019cv00299
Defendant:
JR Reynolds Tobacco Company, John Bel Edwards, Steve Scailise and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Saint Paul Travelers Company Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00002
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Mobile County Inc., Clark Stankowski and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Studio Twenty-One Inc et al
as 5:2018mc00028
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Studio Twenty-One Inc, Sonrose Rutledge, Jr, Dorothy Jeanette Oliver Rutledge and others
In re: Charles Smith
as 18-1236
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES E. SMITH
Defendant - Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DAUPHIN COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Charles Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 18-1003
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, HARRISBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, DENNIS SIMMONS and others
Nominal Respondent:
YVETTE KANE
In re: Charles Smith
as 17-11211
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES THOMAS SMITH
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
