Cases 21 - 30 of 339
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Salud Natural Entrepreneur, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01123
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
SALUD NATURAL ENTREPRENEUR, INC, HECTOR OLIVA, MICHEL MONFORT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Ronald Panella, M.D. et al
as 8:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Ronald Panella, Best Care Medical Group, Inc., Jorge Consuegra and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Edwin Oliva
as 22-50007
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWIN OLIVA
Olivas Flores v. Garland
as 22-38
Petitioner:
LILANA OLIVAS FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Oliva-Santos
as 21-51073
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rodolfo Oliva-Santos
DeWayne Baker v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-2227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE BAKER, a/k/a Dwayne Baker
Defendant / Appellee:
IVAN T. GILMORE, Warden, A. HICKS, Assistant Warden, K. H. TUCKER, Institutional Ombudsman and others
Defendant:
COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, T. HARVEY, Regional Ombudsman Central Region, MARCUS M. HODGES, Regional Administrator Central Region and others
Oliva Chavez v. Garland
as 21-912
Petitioner:
MARGARITA CONCEPCION OLIVA CHAVEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
