Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Vanourny, et al v. Armstrong World Ind, et al
as 8:1992cv00321
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Certainteed Products Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Naneye Vanourny and Stanley D. Vanourny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Babcock v. Armstrong World Ind, et al
as 8:1988cv00040
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Asbestospray Corporation, Certainteed Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Babcock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Ludwick, et al v. Armstrong World Ind, et al
as 8:1992cv00320
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Certainteed Products Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Allen K. Ludwick and Norma M. Ludwick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Herbst, et al v. Armstrong World Ind, et al
as 8:1992cv00316
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Certainteed Products Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry A. Herbst and Marilyn Herbst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY, et al v. HONEYWELL, et al
as 2:1995cv02097
Plaintiff:
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION , LAWRENCE BAKER , MARTHA WEBB HERRING and others
Defendant:
RONED REALTY OF JERSEY CITY, INC. , W.R. GRACE & COMPANY, ECARG, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
W.R. GRACE & COMPANY, W.R. GRACE, LTD., ECARG, INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., W.R. GRACE, LTD., ECARG, INC. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
W.R. GRACE, LTD., ECARG, INC. and W.R. GRACE & COMPANY
Consol_plaintiff:
HACKENSACK RIVERKEEPER, INC. and WILLIAM SHEEHAN
Pecial_master:
ROBERT G. TORRICELLI
Movant:
Day Pitney LLP and K&L Gates LLP
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
United States of Am v. Wildwood Conservat, et al
as 1:1991cv11807
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Wildwood Conservation Corporation, John J. Riley, Jr., Woburn, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
