Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Verna B. Cordrey, et al. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72926
Defendant:
Pittsburgh Corning Corporation
Plaintiff:
Verna B. Cordrey
Nancy Rowan, et al. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72927
Defendant:
Pittsburgh Corning Corporation
Plaintiff:
Nancy Rowan
Jeanne Kollar, et al. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72929
Defendant:
Pittsburgh Corning Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Kollar
Myron M. Cornett, et al. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72930
Plaintiff:
Myron M. Cornett
Defendant:
Pittsburgh Corning Corporation
Lucille L. Jackson, et al. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72931
Defendant:
Pittsburgh Corning Corporation
Plaintiff:
Lucille L. Jackson
Screen v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-70661
Plaintiff:
Screen
Defendant:
Pittsburgh Corning Corporation
Terrance John Thierheimer v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-70662
Defendant:
Pittsburgh Corning Corporation
Plaintiff:
Terrance John Thierheimer
Hagler, et al v. ACandS, Inc., et al
as 3:1992cv00385
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Beck , Mary Ruth Beck , Jesse H. Herndon and others
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc. , M. H. Detrick , Fibreboard Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Totty, et al v. Armstrong World Ind, et al
as 1:1991cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jerry Totty , James R. Reed , Jerry McGinnis and others
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc. , John Crane, Inc. , Flexitallic Gasket Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kanger, et al v. Armstrong World Ind, et al
as 8:1992cv00319
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Certainteed Products Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara L. Kanger and Peter J. Kanger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
