Cases 31 - 40 of 69,613
Alvarez de Melgar v. Donis et al
as 1:2024cv00999
Plaintiff:
Yuri Alvarez de Melgar
Defendant:
Director Antonio Donis and USA Attorney General Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
In Re: Forfeiture Seizure Warrant
as 3:2024mc00068
Not Yet Classified:
Forfeiture Seizure Warrant
Petitioner:
USA
SHOGREN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHOGREN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
NAVA PBC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00869
Plaintiff:
NAVA PBC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
HUNT v. USA
as 1:2024cv00872
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. HUNT
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC v. United States
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC
Defendant:
United States
K.A. v. MindGeek S.a.r.l. et al
as 2:2024cv04786
Plaintiff:
K.A.
Defendant:
MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity, MG Freesites, Ltd, a foreign entity, MindGeek USA Incorporated, a Delaware corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
N.L. v. MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity et al
as 2:2024cv04788
Plaintiff:
N.L.
Defendant:
MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity, MG Freesites, Ltd, a foreign entity, MindGeek USA Incorporated, a Delaware corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. L.T. et al
as 2:2024cv04791
Plaintiff:
L.T.
Defendant:
MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity, MG Freesites, Ltd, a foreign entity, MindGeek USA Incorporated, a Delaware corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
T.C. v. MindGeek S.a.r.l. et al
as 2:2024cv04795
Plaintiff:
T.C.
Defendant:
MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity, MG Freesites, Ltd, a foreign entity, MindGeek USA Incorporated, a Delaware corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
