Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 6,061
USA v. Roger Anderson
as 24-3313
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ROGER DALE ANDERSON
Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. Barron, et al.
as 24-2408
Plaintiff: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION
Defendant: ARMANDO SOLIS BARRON, MICHAEL NABATI, DOMINIC AHIGA and others
Stewart et al v. Ladd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00027
Plaintiff: Jody Virginia Lynn Stewart, Delores Lee Robinette Reynolds and William Joseph Robinette, Sr.
Defendant: Richard E. Ladd, Jr., Karissa H Range, Penn Stuart & Eskridge, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01276
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Turner v. Rogers
as 24-2273
Plaintiff: ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant: YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, DISTRICT JUDGE, US District Court Judge
Ader v. NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01759
Plaintiff: Ali Ader
Defendant: NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., William J. Rieflin, David V. Goeddel and others
Misuraca v. Loke, et al.
as 24-2219
Defendant: AMY BRAEUNINGER, DON at W.C.J, JAMIE LOKE, Corrections Officer at Washington County jail (W.C.J.), HARMONY JONES, Corrections Officer at W.C.J. and others
Plaintiff: AIRIAN JOVAN MISURACA
White, Jr. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 9:2024mc80360
Plaintiff: Thomas Roger White, Jr.
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Rogers v. Weaver, et al.
as 24-2097
Plaintiff: RAY CLARENCE ROGERS
Defendant: WEAVER, Sgt/Supervisor Officer, King County Correctional Facility, KING COUNTY - STATE OF WASHINGTON, Owner of King County Correctional Facility, ALLEN NANCE, Director, King County Correctional Facility and others
Rogers v. Pfeiffer
as 24-2037
Petitioner: SPENCER EARL ROGERS
Respondent: CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?