Cases 41 - 50 of 577
Deng Chol Ayom v. William P. Barr, et al
as 20-2274
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Kurt Freitag, Sheriff, Freeborn County, Peter B. Berg, Director, St. Paul Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Deng Chol Ayom
Dennis Raybould v. Rushmore Loan Management, et al
as 20-35557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAYBOULD
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. BANK, N.A., not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT, whose address is 60 Livingston Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55107-2292, its successors and assigns, (Assignee, RMAC TRUST, SERIES 2016-CTT, RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC and others
Mark Petri v. Stericycle, Incorporated, et al
as 20-2055
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, BOYNTON BEACH FIREFIGHTERS PENSION FUND, ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GOLDMAN SACHS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, CHARLES A. ALUTTO, J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES, LLC and others
Appellant:
MARK PETRI
Adde Sujaa v. William P. Barr, et al
as 20-2060
Respondent:
Peter Berg, Director, St. Paul field Office Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Eric Holien, Kandiyohi County Sheriff, William P. Barr, Acting, Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Adde M. Sujaa
Coleman-Domanoski, et al v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance, et al
as 20-1191
Defendant / Appellee:
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., AKA St. Paul Fire Guardian Insurance Company and ST. PAUL GUARDIAN INSURANCE COMPANY, AKA St. Paul Fire Guardian Insurance Company
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALLORY COLEMAN-DOMANOSKI and JOSHAUA COLEMAN-DOMANOSKI
Ararso Mumad v. William Barr, et al
as 20-2032
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Peter Berg, Director, St. Paul Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Ararso Umare Mumad
In Re: Restasis (Cyclosporine
as 20-1603
Respondent:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, Self Insured Schools of California, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Walgreen Co. and others
Petitioner:
Allergan Inc.
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION et al v. MNUCHIN
as 1:2020cv01002
Plaintiff:
TULALIP TRIBES, HOULTON BAND OF MALISEET INDIANS, AKIAK NATIVE COMMUNITY and others
Defendant:
STEVEN MNUCHIN
Intervenor Defendant:
NAPASKIAK, INCORPORATED, ALASKA NATIVE VILLAGE CORPORATION ASSOCIATION, INC., CALISTA CORPORATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIVE AMERICAN FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY, AFFILIATED TRIBES OF NORTHWEST INDIANS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Abrahim Fofana v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-1623
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Abrahim Mohamed Fofana
Defendant / Appellant:
Tracy Renaud, Associate Director and Service Center Operations Directorate, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Leslie Tritten, Director, Minneapolis St. Paul Field Office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Charles vonRosenberg v. Mark Lawrence
as 20-1061
Defendant / Appellant:
HOLY APOSTLES, BARNWELL, THE RIGHT REVEREND MARK J. LAWRENCE, ST. PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF BENNETTSVILLE, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE RIGHT REVEREND CHARLES G VONROSENBERG, individually and in his capacity as Provisional Bishop of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina, THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN SOUTH CAROLINA and THE RIGHT REVEREND GLADSTONE B. ADAMS, III, individually and in his capacity as the Provisional Bishop of The Episcopal Church in South Carolina
Defendant:
THE VESTRIES AND CHURCHWARDENS OF THE PARISH OF ST. ANDREWS, CHRIST THE KING, WACCAMAW, THE VESTRY AND CHURCH WARDENS OF THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE PARISH OF PRINCE GEORGE WINYAH and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
