Cases 51 - 60 of 1,191
Poaquiza-Choco v. Garland
as 23-8053
Petitioner:
JOHN EDWARD POAQUIZA-CHOCO, LIZETH ESTEFANIA NUNEZ-MOYANO, DANAE JAMILETH POAQUIZA-NUNEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re: David Kauffman
as 23-3179
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Mejia Nunez v. Searls
as 23-7980
Petitioner:
JORDY HERBERT MEJIA NUNEZ
Respondent:
JEFFREY SEARLS, in his official capacity as Officer-in-Charge, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
USA v. Nunez
as 23-40664
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Javier Roberto Nunez
Wright v. Cooke
as 23-7762
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IAN WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT MARTIN, Correctional Warden, CARLOS NUNEZ, Correctional Deputy Warden, JONATHAN PEAU, Correctional Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
ROLLIN COOK, Correctional Commissioner, BYRON KENNEDY, Correctional Chief Medical Officer, MICHAEL BIBENS, Correctional Nutritional Food Services Director and others
Nunez v. Fraser
as 23-7763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAVIER NUNEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NICOLE FRASER, MARK SILBER, ELI SILBER and others
Defendant:
OLIVIA GIEGERICH, MARK SIMON and PACHECO, Police Officer for City of New York/Detective Squad
Solorio Nunez v. Garland
as 23-3416
Petitioner:
JORGE SOLORIO NUNEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Sierra (Cruz)
as 23-7642
Defendant:
LEONIDES SIERRA, RICHARD GONZALEZ, CARLOS URENA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE CRUZ, Sealed Defendant 3, Prostituto and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Tauri Rivas Nunez
as 23-13546
Petitioner:
In re: TAURI BENJAMIN RIVAS NUNEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: Nunez Vazquez
as 23-8032
Respondent:
AXEL A. NUNEZ VAZQUEZ
Interested Party:
TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
