Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 134
Ronald Haddad, Jr. v. Virginia Kendall
as 15-2884
Petitioner: RONALD HADDAD, JR.
Respondent: VIRGINIA M. KENDALL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00847
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Camille Haddad v. Alexander, Zelmanski, Danner
as 15-1911
Plaintiff - Appellee: CAMILLE HADDAD
Defendant - Appellant: ALEXANDER, ZELMANSKI, DANNER & FIORITTO, PLLC
United States of America v. Haddad
as 2:2015mc51038
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Wasfi Haddad
HADDAD v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00640
Plaintiff: RON HADDAD, JR.
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
HADDAD v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01075
Plaintiff: RON HADDAD, JR.
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03441
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Ronald Haddad, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1398
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RONALD HADDAD, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1099
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Keith Dougherty, et al, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-4580
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: KEITH DOUGHERTY, President/Secretary of CUC of MD Inc.
Plaintiff - Respondent: MARYLAND CLOSE CORP, (S Corp) (Director) of Ken & Jim CUC Inc. Wholly owned subsidiary of CUC of MD Inc., DOCSON CONSULTING LLC SMLLC and R. MICHAEL BEST
Defendant - Respondent: US FOODS INC DELAWARE DIVISION, CLUCK U CORP, J. P. HADDAD and others
Nominal Respondent: J. FREDERICK MOTZ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?