Cases 61 - 70 of 702
Heidi Stirrup, et al v. DOD, et al
as 23-5094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Heidi Stirrup, personally and in her capacity as a member of the United States Air Force Academy Board of Visitors, Mark Edward Green, personally and in his official capacity as a member of the United States Military Academy Board of Visitors, and a Member of the Unites States House Armed Services Committee, and the United States Congress, Ralph Warren Norman, Jr., personally and in his official capacity as a Member of the United States Congress and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Defense, Lloyd J. Austin, III, General, USA (Ret.), in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Defense, United States Department of the Air Force and others
Tysha Holmes v. United States Department of the Army
as 23-1459
Petitioner:
TYSHA S. HOLMES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Rosales v. Wormuth et al
as 1:2023cv00440
Plaintiff:
Denise A Rosales
Defendant:
Christine Wormuth, United States Department of the Army, Gregory D. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
STALLINGS-FIELDS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
BELINDA STALLINGS-FIELDS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
BELINDA STALLINGS-FIELDS and NO PARTY
Defendant:
THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Hockenberry v. Department of the Army
as 1:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Scott R. Hockenberry
Defendant:
Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
