Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 151 - 160 of 18,774
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00302
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01242
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Hunter v. Addison on Main et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00565
Defendant: Gene B Glick, Mishawaka Housing Authority and Addision on Main
Plaintiff: Cynthia Justine Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUNLAP v. SCOTT et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Defendant: MARIAM EFENGER, MARIAM HASKEL and THOMAS ALLAN SCOTT
Plaintiff: KEVIN R. DUNLAP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01430
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00266
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v Instagram
as 2:2024cv00226
Defendant: Instagram
Plaintiff: Mitch Taebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01433
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Friends of Prentice
as 1:2024cv00288
Plaintiff: Mitch Taebel
Defendant: Friends of Prentice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00351
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?