Cases 31 - 40 of 220
Doe et al v. Barnes et al
as 8:2020cv02770
Defendant:
Deputy Barnes, Anderson County and Anderson County Sheriffs Office, The
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Lexington, County of et al
as 3:2020cv02773
Defendant:
Nicholas McMillin, Nicholas Uveges, Lexington, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Judy Diane Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doe-2 v. Richland County School District 2 et al
as 3:2020cv02274
Defendant:
Sheriff Leon Lott, Richland County School District 2, Captain John E. Ewing and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Richland County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2020cv02212
Defendant:
Unknown South Carolina Department of Corrections Special Response Team Officers, Unknown Richland County Sheriff's Deputies, Columbia, City of Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv02184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Roberts v. Holbrook et al
as 3:2020cv00956
Defendant:
Sheriff Leon Lott, Columbia, City of, Richland County and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tarashuk v. Orangeburg County et al
as 5:2019cv02495
Defendant:
Orangeburg County Emergency Medical Services, Danny Rivers, Jamie D Givens and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Tarashuk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv01470
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01287
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
