Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Gadekan v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 4:2012cv03208
Defendant:
1-100 Unknown USDA Officials, 1-100 non-USDA employees, Beverly Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
John A. Gadekan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv03184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Standifer v. Broadmoore Development Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv00177
Defendant:
Broadmoore Development Inc. and Thomasville Inc
Plaintiff:
Steven Standifer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Standifer v. Broadmoon Development et al
as 8:2012cv00176
Defendant:
Stephanie Alba and Broadmoon Development
Plaintiff:
Steven Standifer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Hayes et al v. Heineman et al.
as 4:2011cv03229
Plaintiff:
Matthew Adams, Eric J. Aho, Jr., Cynthia Alberico and others
Defendant:
Carlos Castillo, Dave Heineman, Shane Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blair v. Douglas County et al
as 8:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Blair
Defendant:
Stuart Dornan, Douglas County, Douglas County Court Administrators and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Elmshaeuser
as 4:2011cv03126
Defendant:
Steven E. Elmshaeuser
Plaintiff:
Waya Tsalagi Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Retz v. Turnball et al
as 8:2011cv00168
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Steven Garcia, William Seaton and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Retz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Retz v. Turnball et al
as 8:2011cv00169
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Steven Garcia, William Seaton and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Retz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
