Cases 31 - 40 of 2,005
Northup v. Reilly et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Northup
Defendant:
William Reilly and Andrew Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marin v. Billings et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Maryann Marin
Defendant:
Jack Billings, Merrie Scott, Newport County Community Mental Health Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cofield v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Defendant:
PNC Bank, U.S. Postal Service, N.Y. E.B.T. and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Cofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fantel, Jr. v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Fantel, Jr. v. FBI et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
FBI, Caitlin Isherwood and Mark Trovato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Huntley v. Piccirillo et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Huntley
Defendant:
Nurse David Piccirillo, DOC Medical Director, D.O.C Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Landry v. Rhode Island State Police et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Defendant:
Ana Cristina Cola, Rhode Island State Police, Lt. R. Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Norman J. Landry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
