Cases 91 - 100 of 30,546
Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
Foothills Correctional Institution, FNU Hudgins, FNU Motley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blount v. Bertie County et al
as 5:2024ct03131
Plaintiff:
Q'Zavieon Kemartez Blount
Defendant:
Bertie County and L. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Truner et al
as 5:2024ct03132
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Hall
Defendant:
Sgt. Truner and Lt. Cribbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitzgerald v. Jane Doe et al
as 5:2024ct03130
Plaintiff:
Shawreed Jawon Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and John Doe Deputy Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. UNKNOWN STATE OFFICIALS
as 1:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEWIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNKNOWN STATE OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMSON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
TORSHAZO WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MR. BROWN, SAM PAGE, CAPTAIN MS. JENNIFER BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodge v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03129
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Hodge
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Blakney v. Garland et al
as 5:2024hc02067
Petitioner:
Larry Blakney
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pacheco v. Love et al
as 5:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Skyler Love, FNU Greene, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MASHORE v. NAVES
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
RODRIQUEZ DWAYNE MASHORE
Defendant:
SGT. JASON JAGGER NAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
